2018-03-02 3:38 GMT+01:00 Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de>: > On 2018-03-02 03:13:04 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > 2018-03-01 23:10 GMT+01:00 Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de>: > > > > > On 2018-01-23 17:08:56 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > > 2018-01-22 23:15 GMT+01:00 Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net>: > > > > > This really could use a new thread, imv. This thread is a year > old and > > > > > about a completely different feature than what you've implemented > here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > true, but now it is too late > > > > > > At the very least the CF entry could be renamed moved out the procedual > > > language category? > > > > > > > Why not? > > Because the patch adds GUCs that don't have a direct connection > toprocedual languages? And the patch's topic still says "plpgsql plan > cache behave" which surely is misleading. > > Seems fairly obvious that neither category nor name is particularly > descriptive of the current state? > > ok
> > Have you idea, what category is best? > > Server Features? Misc? And as a title something about "add GUCs to > control custom plan logic"? > > I'll move it there. Regards Pavel > > Greetings, > > Andres Freund >
