On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 9:06 PM, Antonin Houska <a...@cybertec.at> wrote:
> David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> wrote:
>> Does this look right to you?
> Yes, this is what I meant. The patch applies cleanly and the code compiles
> well.
>> If so, can you sign up as a reviewer and mark it Ready for Committer?
> Done.


> Actually I think it'd be nice if the "parallel_hash" argument was mentioned in
> the header comment of initial_cost_hashjoin() function, but not sure this is
> worth returning the patch to the author.


Thomas Munro

Attachment: 0001-Fix-costing-of-parallel-hash-joins-v2.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to