On 1/12/18 7:53 AM, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
> On 12.01.2018 03:40, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net>
>>> * Konstantin Knizhnik (k.knizh...@postgrespro.ru) wrote:
>>>> Updated version of the patch is attached.
>>> This patch appears to apply with just a bit of fuzz and make check
>>> passes, so I'm not sure why this is currently marked as 'Waiting for
>>> I've updated it to be 'Needs review'. If that's incorrect, feel free to
>>> change it back with an explanation.
>> Hi Konstantin,
>> undefined reference to `PortalGetHeapMemory'
>> That's because commit 0f7c49e85518dd846ccd0a044d49a922b9132983 killed
>> PortalGetHeapMemory. Looks like it needs to be replaced with
> Hi Thomas,
> Thank you very much for reporting the problem.
> Rebased version of the patch is attached.
This patch has received no review or comments since last May and appears
too complex and invasive for the final CF of PG11.
I don't think it makes sense to keep pushing a patch through CFs when it
is not getting reviewed. I'm planning to mark this as Returned with
Feedback unless there are solid arguments to the contrary.