On 3/2/18 03:23, Michael Paquier wrote: > That's a better idea. I have reworked that in 0001. What do you think? > This has the same effect as diag(), which shows information directly to > the screen, and that's the behavior I was looking for.
I ended up using plan skip_all, which seems to be intended for this purpose, according to the documentation. > I have concluded about using the most simple name: PG_TEST_EXTRA. A > documentation attempt is added as well. This is unfortunately close to > EXTRA_TESTS. It would be tempting to directly reuse EXTRA_TESTS as > well, however this is used only for the core regression tests now, so a > separated variable seems adapted to me. Committed. Very nice. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
