Hi Maksim, On 3/5/18 11:24 AM, Maksim Milyutin wrote: > Hello David, > > > On 05.03.2018 18:50, David Steele wrote: >> Hello Maksim, >> >> On 1/27/18 2:19 PM, Arthur Zakirov wrote: >> >>> Is there actual need in UnregisterCustomProcSignal() within _PG_init()? >>> An extension registers a handler and then unregister it doing >>> nothing. It seems useless. >>> >>> Also process_shared_preload_libraries_in_progress within _PG_fini() will >>> be false I think. _PG_fini() won't be called though, because >>> implementation of internal_unload_library() is disabled. >>> >>> Actually, is there need in UnregisterCustomProcSignal() at all? It >>> unregisters a handler only in current backend, for actual unergistering >>> we need to call it everywhere, if I'm not mistaken. >> This patch has been in Waiting on Author state for almost three weeks. >> Have you had a chance to consider Arthur's suggestions? > > Yes, I want to rework my patch to enable setup of custom signals on > working backend without preload initialization. > >> Do you know when you'll have an updated patch available? > > I want to actuate the work on this patch for the next 12 release. Sorry, > for now I can not keep up with the current release. Understood. I'll mark it Returned with Feedback and you can enter it in a CF when you have a new patch.
Regards, -- -David da...@pgmasters.net
