Tom, all, * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> writes: > > On 2/28/18 2:28 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > >> That's basically a recursive chmod, so chmod_recursive is more adapted? > >> I could imagine that this is useful as well for removing group > >> permissions, so the new mode could be specified as an argument. > > > The required package (File::chmod::Recursive) for chmod_recursive is not > > in use anywhere else and was not installed when I installed build > > dependencies. > > > I'm not sure what the protocol for introducing a new Perl module is? I > > couldn't find packages for the major OSes. Are we OK with using CPAN? > > I don't think that's cool. Anything that's not part of a standard Perl > installation is a bit of a lift already, and if it's not packaged by > major distros then it's really a problem for many people. (Yeah, they > may know what CPAN is, but they might have local policy issues about > installing directly from there.)
Agreed. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
