On 2018-03-05 19:53:23 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > Scratch that, we should be going down the > > /* If caller supplied OID, there's nothing we need do here. */ > > branch in expand_vacuum_rel() for autovacuum, so this shouldn't > > matter. Sorry for the noise > > But you said you'd seen blocking behind AEL with NOWAIT, so there's > still a problem for manual vacuums no?
Right. But that facility isn't yet exposed to SQL, just in the patch I'm reviewing. So there's no issue with the code from the commit I'm replying to. In [1] I wrote about one idea how to resolve this for the proposed patch. Greetings, Andres Freund [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180306005349.b65whmvj7z6hb...@alap3.anarazel.de
