On 2018/03/06 19:16, Emre Hasegeli wrote:
>> Hmm, state->next refers to two different pointer values on line 1 and line
>> 2.  It may end up being set to NULL on line 1.  Am I missing something?
> True, lnext(state->next) can set it to NULL.  I confused by the below
> code on the same function doing the steps in reverse order.  With this
> cleared, I have nothing else to say, so I am setting this to ready for
> committer.

Thanks. :)


Reply via email to