On 2018/03/06 19:16, Emre Hasegeli wrote: >> Hmm, state->next refers to two different pointer values on line 1 and line >> 2. It may end up being set to NULL on line 1. Am I missing something? > > True, lnext(state->next) can set it to NULL. I confused by the below > code on the same function doing the steps in reverse order. With this > cleared, I have nothing else to say, so I am setting this to ready for > committer.
Thanks. :) Regards, Amit
