On 3/4/18 17:15, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Do I think this patch is realistic to target for v11? Well. Given where we
> are in the cycle, I don’t think any new TLS implementation going in is
> realistic at this point since none of the proposed ones have had enough tyre
> kicking done. That might change should there be lots of interest and work
> started soon, but as has been discussed elsewhere recently the project has
> limited resources. I have time to work on this, and support reviewers of it,
> but that’s only piece of the puzzle.
I think it would be best if both this patch and the GnuTLS patch are
moved to the next CF and are attacked early in the PG12 cycle.
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services