On 3/4/18 17:15, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > Do I think this patch is realistic to target for v11? Well. Given where we > are in the cycle, I don’t think any new TLS implementation going in is > realistic at this point since none of the proposed ones have had enough tyre > kicking done. That might change should there be lots of interest and work > started soon, but as has been discussed elsewhere recently the project has > limited resources. I have time to work on this, and support reviewers of it, > but that’s only piece of the puzzle.
I think it would be best if both this patch and the GnuTLS patch are moved to the next CF and are attacked early in the PG12 cycle. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services