At Sat, 3 Mar 2018 09:46:11 -0500, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote in <7f1e5f2f-4902-2c29-de82-381de8cc6...@2ndquadrant.com> > On 3/1/18 23:39, Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:27:13AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > >> If I understand correctly there's been no progress on this since, and > >> there'd definitely need to be major work to get something we can agree > >> upon. Doesn't seem v11 material. I think we should mark this as returned > >> with feedback. Arguments against? > > > > Agreed with your position. The TAP tests rely on IPC::Run as a pillar > > of its infrastructure. I think that if we need a base API to do such > > capabilities we ought to prioritize what we can do with it first instead > > of trying to reinvent the wheel as this patch proposes in such a > > complicated way. > > I haven't seen any explanation for a problem this is solving. The > original submission contained a sample test case, by I don't see why > that couldn't be done with the existing infrastructure. > > Patch closed for now.
Agreed. This is not a v11 matter. Thanks. regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
