Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: >> Changing the defaults to go back down strikes me as an entirely wrong >> approach after we've had a release with the higher defaults without >> seriously compelling arguments against, and I don't agree that we've had >> such a case made here.
> +1. I don't see any real downside of increasing the minimum value of > max_connections to 20. I wasn't particularly a fan of raising > max_wal_senders to 10, but a lot of other people were, and so far > nobody's reported any problems related to that setting (that I know > about). OK, seems like I'm on the short end of that vote. I propose to push the GUC-crosschecking patch I posted yesterday, but not the default-value change, and instead push Kyotaro-san's initdb change. Should we back-patch these things to v10 where the problem appeared? regards, tom lane