Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > ... I suppose we could still decide that if we > can't have that, we don't want update tuple routing at all, but I > think that's an overreaction.
Between this thread and
<CAJ3gD9fRbEzDqdeDq1jxqZUb47kJn+tQ7=bcgjc8quqksdv...@mail.gmail.com>
I am getting the distinct impression that that feature wasn't ready
to be committed. I think that reverting it for v11 is definitely
an option that needs to be kept on the table.
regards, tom lane
