From: Michael Paquier [mailto:mich...@paquier.xyz] > Hm. durable_xx should remain a sane operation as an isolated call as you > still get the same problem if a crash happens before flushing the parent... > Fujii-san idea also has value to speed up the end of recovery but this costs > as well in extra recycling operations post promotion. If the checkpoint > was to happen a the end of recovery then that would be more logic, but we > don't for performance reasons. Let's continue to discuss on this thread. > If you have any patch to offer, let's also look at them. > > Anyway, as things are pretty much idle on this thread for a couple of days > and that we are still discussing potential ideas, I think that this entry > should be marked as returned with feedback. Thoughts?
OK, I moved this to the next CF. Thank you for your cooperation. Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
