On 03/17/2018 08:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >> On March 17, 2018 12:25:57 PM PDT, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> If we're not putting a test into the back branches, then we darn >>> well better be using the same code there as in HEAD, else we >>> won't know that it actually solves the problem. > >> I was thinking of committing your version everywhere and then >> revising in master after a bf cycle. > > Meh. I don't really feel a need to change it at all, but if we do, > I think it should be "after a release cycle" not just a few days. > We need to see whether that regression test will expose any problems > on a wider variety of compilers than exist in the buildfarm. > > Anyway, pushed for now --- Tomas, if you blocked fulmar, it should > be safe to unblock. >
OK, enabled again. It'll take a while to run through the branches. I guess it might want to notify people running affected animals, because otherwise they may stay stuck for a long time. regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
