> On 2 Oct 2021, at 08:18, Erik Rijkers <[email protected]> wrote:
> So the issue is not as serious as it seemed.
This is also not related to this patch in any way, or am I missing a point
here? This can just as well be achieved without this patch.
> The complaint remaining is only that this could somehow be documented better.
The pg_dump documentation today have a large highlighted note about this:
"When --include-foreign-data is specified, pg_dump does not check that the
foreign table is writable. Therefore, there is no guarantee that the
results of a foreign table dump can be successfully restored."
This was extensively discussed [0] when this went in, is there additional
documentation you'd like to see for this?
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
[0]
https://postgr.es/m/lejpr01mb0185483c0079d2f651b16231e7...@lejpr01mb0185.deuprd01.prod.outlook.de
