Thanks to you both! From: Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> Date: Monday, October 4, 2021 at 11:36 AM To: Jacob Champion <[email protected]> Cc: Rachel Heaton <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Print error when libpq-refs-stamp fails > On 4 Oct 2021, at 19:21, Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 4 Oct 2021, at 19:02, Jacob Champion <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 2021-10-04 at 23:40 +0700, Anton Voloshin wrote: >>> >>> Could you please confirm that the change from -A to -a in nm arguments >>> in this patch is intentional? >> >> That was not intended by us, thank you for the catch! A stray >> lowercasing in vim, perhaps. > > Hmm, I will take care of this shortly.
Right, so I missed this in reviewing and testing, and I know why the latter didn't catch it. nm -A and -a outputs the same thing *for this input* on my Debian and macOS boxes, with the small difference that -A prefixes the line with the name of the input file. -a also include debugger symbols, but for this usage it didn't alter the results. I will go ahead and fix this, thanks for catching it! -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
