On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 1:55 PM Antonin Houska <a...@cybertec.at> wrote: > I'm just trying to make our changes to buffile.c less invasive. Or do you mean > that this module should be reworked regardless the encryption?
I wasn't thinking of buffile.c specifically. I think improving that might be a really good idea, although I'm not 100% sure I know what that would look like. I was thinking that it's unfortunate that there are so many different ways that I/O happens overall. Like, there are direct write() and pg_pwrite() calls in various places, for example. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
