On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 09:23:32AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 12:13 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> > wrote: >> * PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND. Should be innocuous I think, since the >> "parent" process already has this flag and thus shouldn't be cancelled. > > Currently, we don't support parallel vacuum for autovacuum. So > parallel workers for vacuum don't have these two flags.
That's something that should IMO be marked in the code as a comment as something to worry about once/if someone begins playing with parallel autovacuum. If the change involving autovacuum is simple, I see no reason to not add this part now, though. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
