Mark Simon <m...@manngo.net> writes:
> I’m not asking for a change in how PostgreSQL manages variables, but
> whether it’s possible to allow the @ sign, and possibly the $ sign to
> start a variable name.
@ is allowed in operator names, and indeed is used in (mumble select
count(*) ...) 59 built-in operators. So we could not support that
without breaking a lot of applications. Is "a<@b" to be parsed as
"a <@ b" or "a < @b"? For that matter, is "@a" a name or an invocation
of the built-in prefix operator "@" on variable "a"?
As for allowing $ to start a name, there are also issues:
* It'd be rather ambiguous with the $id$ string delimiter syntax [1],
which is a Postgres-ism for sure, but a lot of people use it.
* It'd not be entirely clear whether $1 is a variable name
or a parameter reference.
* I think there are client interfaces that allow $name to be
a parameter symbol, so we'd also be breaking anything that
works that way.
Maybe we could have done this twenty years ago, but I think
compatibility considerations preclude it now.
regards, tom lane
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-syntax-lexical.html#SQL-SYNTAX-DOLLAR-QUOTING
