On 2/26/18 3:19 AM, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 2:20 AM, Robert Haas <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 5:56 AM, Alexander Korotkov > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > BTW, EnterpriseDB announces zheap table access method (heap with undo > log) > > [2]. I think this is great, and I'm looking forward for publishing > zheap in > > mailing lists. But I'm concerning about its compatibility with > pluggable > > table access methods API. Does zheap use table AM API from this > thread? Or > > does it just override current heap and needs to be adopted to use table > AM > > API? Or does it implements own API? > > Right now it just hacks the code. The plan is to adapt it to whatever > API we settle on in this thread. > > > Great, thank you for clarification. I'm looking forward reviewing zheap :) I think this entry should be moved the the next CF. I'll do that tomorrow unless there are objections.
Regards, -- -David [email protected]
