Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> I would follow the practice of upstream to include both if were me
> to be consistent, but I'm also fine if you just add x509v3.h to
> be-secure-openssl.c.

Another thing that's potentially relevant here is that
be-secure-openssl.c and fe-secure-openssl.c are including
ssl-related headers in different orders.  Theoretically
that shouldn't make any difference, but ...

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to