Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > I would follow the practice of upstream to include both if were me > to be consistent, but I'm also fine if you just add x509v3.h to > be-secure-openssl.c.
Another thing that's potentially relevant here is that be-secure-openssl.c and fe-secure-openssl.c are including ssl-related headers in different orders. Theoretically that shouldn't make any difference, but ... regards, tom lane