On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 7:11 PM osumi.takami...@fujitsu.com <osumi.takami...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure about the last part. > > additionally increase the available subscriber memory, > Which GUC parameter did you mean by this ? > Could we point out and enalrge the memory size only for > subscriber's apply processing intentionally ? > I incorporated (7) except for this last part. > Will revise according to your reply. > I might have misinterpreted your original description, so I'll re-review that in your latest patch.
As a newer version (v20) of the prerequisite patch was posted a day ago, it looks like your patch needs to be rebased against that (as it currently applies on top of the v19 version only). Regards, Greg Nancarrow Fujitsu Australia
