"Bossart, Nathan" <bossa...@amazon.com> writes:
> On 10/29/21, 5:07 PM, "Tom Lane" <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I was afraid somebody would say that. I have looked at it, but AFAICS
>> we'd have to duplicate all of sprompt.c and nearly all of pg_get_line.c
>> in order to tie it into psql's SIGINT infrastructure, since we wouldn't
>> dare enable the signal handler except during the innermost fgets() call,
>> and if we did get a signal we'd still need to clean up the terminal echo
>> state, so we couldn't just longjmp out of simple_prompt(). The
>> cost/benefit ratio of that doesn't look very good.
> Hm. Is it really necessary to duplicate all of sprompt.c and
> pg_get_line.c? Would it be possible to teach the existing functions
> how to optionally enable SIGINT handling instead? I wouldn't mind
> trying my hand at this if it seems like a reasonable approach.
It seems to me it'd overcomplicate simple_prompt's API for one use-case
... but if you want to try it, step right up. (I suppose some of that
objection could be overcome by making simple_prompt into a wrapper
around another function not_so_simple_prompt.)
regards, tom lane
