Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 10:26:11PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> However, that's largely orthogonal to any of the things my proposed >> patches are trying to fix. If you want to review the patches without >> considering the fsync-error-handling problem, that'd be great.
> I have looked at them upthread, FWIW: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/yytsj5vlwp5fa...@paquier.xyz > Your proposals still look rather sane to me, after a second look. Pushed then; thanks for reviewing that. We can consider the fsync error question at leisure. regards, tom lane
