Le mer. 1 déc. 2021 à 19:48, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> a écrit :
> Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> writes: > > @Guillaume: Even if memory use with the patch isn't constant, I imagine > it's > > enough to have avoided OOM. > > I think it's good enough in HEAD. In the back branches, the sinval > queue growth is bad enough that there's still an issue. Still, > this is a useful improvement, so I added some comments and pushed it. > > Thanks. -- Guillaume.
