On Mon, Dec 6, 2021, at 3:44 AM, Amit Kapila wrote: > I think what you said as (b) is wrong because we want to allow builtin > immutable functions. See discussion [1]. It was a typo. I mean "non-immutable" function.
> True, but that is the main reason the review and development are being > done as separate sub-features. I suggest still keeping the similar > separation till some of the reviews of each of the patches are done, > otherwise, we need to rethink how to divide for easier review. We need > to retain the 0005 patch because that handles many problems without > which the main patch is incomplete and buggy w.r.t replica identity. IMO we should merge sub-features as soon as we reach consensus. Every new sub-feature breaks comments, tests and documentation if you want to remove or rearrange patches. It seems I misread 0005. I agree that it is important. I'll check it. -- Euler Taveira EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
