On 12/8/21 09:08, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: > > Either way, I think we should be switching tests to done_testing() > whenever it would otherwise have to adjust the test count, to avoid > having to do that again and again and again going forward. >
I'm not so sure. I don't think its necessarily a bad idea to have to declare how many tests you're going to run. I appreciate it gets hard in some cases, which is why we have now insisted on a Test::More version that supports subtests. I suppose we could just take the attitude that we're happy with however many tests it actually runs, and as long as they all pass we're good. It just seems slightly sloppy. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
