On 12/9/21, 12:33 PM, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossa...@amazon.com> wrote: > On 12/9/21, 11:34 AM, "John Naylor" <john.nay...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> Now that we have a concept of a fail-safe vacuum, maybe it would be >> beneficial to skip a vacuum in single-user mode if the fail-safe >> criteria were not met at the beginning of vacuuming a relation. This >> is not without risk, of course, but it should be much faster than >> today and once up and running the admin would have a chance to get a >> handle on things. Thoughts? > > Would the --min-xid-age and --no-index-cleanup vacuumdb options help > with this?
Sorry, I'm not sure what I was thinking. Of coure you cannot use vacuumdb in single-user mode. But I think something like --min-xid-age in VACUUM is what you are looking for. Nathan
