Hi, On 2021-12-13 19:46:34 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 05:20:52PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > > These days isolationtester.c already prefixes log output with the session > > name. How about doing the same for application_name? It's a *tad* more > > complicated than I'd like because isolationtester.c currently doesn't know > > the > > name of the test its executing. > > +1 for the idea. Maybe it could be backpatched?
Not entirely trivially - the changes have some dependencies on other changes (e.g. b1907d688, more on 741d7f104, but that was backpatched). I guess we could backpatch b1907d688 as well, but I'm not sure its worth it? > > + * easier to map spec file sesions to log output and > > One s/sesions/sessions/ here. Ah, good catch. Greetings, Andres Freund
