> On 14 Dec 2021, at 05:11, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2021-12-14 16:51:58 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: >> I'd better go and figure out how to fix cfbot when this lands... > > I assume it'd be: > - stop adding the CI stuff > - adjust links to CI tasks, appveyor wouldn't be used anymore > - perhaps reference individual tasks from the cfbot page?
+1 on leveraging the CI tasks in the tree in the CFBot. For a patch like the libnss TLS backend one it would be a great help to both developer and reviewer to have that codepath actually built and tested as part of the CFBot; being able to tweak the CI tasks used in the CFBot per patch would be very helpful. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
