On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 8:23 AM Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 7:03 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks, I can take care of this before committing. The v9-0001* looks > > good to me as well, so, I am planning to commit that tomorrow unless I > > see more comments or any objection to that. > > I would like to thank both Masahiko and yourself for working on this. > It's important. > > > There is still pending > > work related to moving parallel vacuum code to a separate file and a > > few other pending comments that are still under discussion. We can > > take care of those in subsequent patches. Do, let me know if you or > > others think differently? > > I'm +1 on moving it into a new file. I think that that division makes > perfect sense. It will make the design of parallel VACUUM easier to > understand. >
Agreed and thanks for your support. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
