Le 15/12/2021 à 13:41, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
On 03.08.21 19:10, Tom Lane wrote:
Gilles Darold <gil...@darold.net> writes:
Sorry I have missed that, but I'm fine with this implemenation so let's
keep the v6 version of the patch and drop this one.
Pushed, then. There's still lots of time to tweak the behavior of
course.
I have a documentation follow-up to this. It seems that these new
functions are almost a de facto standard, whereas the SQL-standard
functions are not implemented anywhere. I propose the attached patch
to update the subsection in the pattern-matching section to give more
detail on this and suggest equivalent functions among these newly
added ones. What do you think?
I'm in favor to apply your changes to documentation. It is a good thing
to precise the relation between this implementation of the regex_*
functions and the SQL stardard.
--
Gilles Darold
