Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes: > oops, I just saw that you have already pushed a fix for it. I am not > sure if we should try to do anything about walrcv_receive's output > still uses pgsocket instead of int as the usage in itself doesn't have > any problem.
I see a few places where we're still assigning PQsocket's result to a
pgsocket variable, but none of them are worrying about the possibility
that it's not a valid socket, and I'm not sure they need to.
regards, tom lane
