On Thu, Jan 6, 2022, at 1:18 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 8:43 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:52 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > ...
> >
> > > Another minor comment:
> > > +static bool pgoutput_row_filter(enum ReorderBufferChangeType changetype,
> > >
> > > Do we need to specify the 'enum' type before changetype parameter?
> > >
> >
> > That is because there is currently no typedef for the enum
> > ReorderBufferChangeType.
> >
>
> But I see that the 0002 patch is already adding the required typedef.
IMO we shouldn't reuse ReorderBufferChangeType. For a long-term solution, it is
fragile. ReorderBufferChangeType has values that do not matter for row filter
and it relies on the fact that REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_INSERT,
REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_UPDATE and REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_DELETE are the first 3
values from the enum, otherwise, it breaks rfnodes and no_filters in
pgoutput_row_filter(). I suggest a separate enum that contains only these 3
values.
enum RowFilterPublishAction {
PUBLISH_ACTION_INSERT,
PUBLISH_ACTION_UPDATE,
PUBLISH_ACTION_DELETE
};
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
