Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> writes: > (That patch is assuming that we're looking for something simple to > back-patch, in the event that we decide not to just revert the > graceful shutdown patch from back branches. Reverting might be a > better idea for now, and then we could fix all this stuff going > forward.)
FWIW, I'm just fine with reverting, particularly in the back branches. It seems clear that this dank corner of Windows contains even more creepy-crawlies than we thought. regards, tom lane