Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 06:10:07PM -0800, Noah Misch wrote:
>> Could do that. Every run that doesn't get the flaky failure will print a
>> message like "TODO passed: 3-5", though the test file could mitigate that by
>> declaring the TODO only on configurations where we expect a failure. The
>> 027_stream_regress.pl trouble involves reaching a die(), not failing a test
>> in
>> this sense, so that one would take more work.
> Using a TODO has the advantage to allow the tests to run on a periodic
> basis, even if they could fail in this unexpected way.
I'm okay with this *if* the TODO marking can be constrained to platforms
where we know there's a problem. Otherwise I'm afraid it will mask
unexpected problems.
regards, tom lane
