On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:59:40AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 07:51:37PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > Neat idea. That would work fine for my case. So I am fine to stick > > with this suggestion. > > I have been looking at this idea, and the result is quite nice, being > simpler than anything that has been proposed on this thread yet. We > get a simpler removal logic, and there is no need to perform any kind > of sanity checks with the output path provided as long as we generate > the paths and the dirs after adjust_data_dir(). > > Thoughts?
Andrew: you wanted to accommodate any change on the build client, right ? -- Justin
