Hi, On 2022-01-27 15:27:17 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > fairywren is not happy with the recovery tests still.
Any more details? > I have noticed on a different setup that this test adds 11 minutes to the > runtime of the recovery tests, effectively doubling it. The doubling is > roughly true on faster setups, too Does a normal regress run take roughly that long? Or is the problem that the 027_stream_regress.pl ends up defaulting to shared_buffers=1MB, causing lots of unnecessary IO? > . At least I would like a simple > way to disable the test. One thing we could do to speed up the overall runtime would be to move 027_stream_regress.pl to something numbered earlier. Combined with PROVE_FLAGS=-j2 that could at least run them in parallel with the rest of the recovery tests. Greetings, Andres Freund
