On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:18:15AM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 09:56:04AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> Hmm. I have been looking at this patch, and the lack of centralized >> solution that could be used for other GUCs worries me like Fujii-san, >> even if this would prevent an incorrect use of MaxBackends in contexts >> where it should not be used because it is not initialized yet. I >> don't think it is a good idea in the long-term to apply this as-is. > > Alright. I think the comment adjustments still apply, so I split those out > to a new patch.
No objections to this part from here, though I have not checked if there are other areas that may require such an adjustment. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
