> On 28 Jan 2022, at 15:30, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 9:08 AM Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> wrote: >>> Kinda makes me question the wisdom of starting to depend on NSS. When >>> openssl >>> docs are vastly outshining a library's, that library really should start to >>> ask itself some hard questions. > > Yeah, OpenSSL is very poor, so being worse is not good. > >> Sadly, there is that. While this is not a new problem, Mozilla has been >> making >> some very weird decisions around NSS governance as of late. Another data >> point >> is the below thread from libcurl: >> >> https://curl.se/mail/lib-2022-01/0120.html > > I would really, really like to have an alternative to OpenSSL for PG. > I don't know if this is the right thing, though. If other people are > dropping support for it, that's a pretty bad sign IMHO. Later in the > thread it says OpenLDAP have dropped support for it already as well.
I'm counting this and Andres' comment as a -1 on the patchset, and given where we are in the cycle I'm mark it rejected in the CF app shortly unless anyone objects. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
