On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 2:27 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 02:11:18PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > > Committed. I'm going to be 0% surprised if the buildfarm turns pretty > > colors, but I don't know how to know what it's going to be unhappy > > about except by trying it, so here goes. > > Thanks! I'll keep an eye on the buildfarm and will send any new patches > that are needed.
Andres just pointed out to me that thorntail is unhappy: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=thorntail&dt=2022-02-03%2019%3A54%3A42 It says: ==~_~===-=-===~_~== pgsql.build/contrib/basic_archive/log/postmaster.log ==~_~===-=-===~_~== 2022-02-03 23:17:49.019 MSK [1253623:1] FATAL: WAL archival cannot be enabled when wal_level is "minimal" The notes for the machine say: UBSan; force_parallel_mode; wal_level=minimal; OS bug breaks truncate() So apparently we need to either skip this test when wal_level=minimal, or force a higher wal_level to be used for this particular test. Not sure what the existing precedents are, if any. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
