Em dom., 13 de fev. de 2022 às 18:43, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> escreveu:
> Hi, > > On 2022-02-13 18:21:38 -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote: > > Why open and lock the table Extended Statistics if it is not the owner. > > Check and return to avoid this. > > I was about to say that this opens up time-to-check-time-to-use type > issues. But it's the wrong thing to lock to prevent those. > > Having looked briefly at it, I don't understand what the locking scheme is? > Shouldn't there be at least some locking against concurrent ALTERs and > between > ALTER and ANALYZE etc? > I checked the pg_statistics_object_ownercheck function and I think the patch is wrong. It seems to me that when using SearchSysCache1, it is necessary to open and lock the table. Better remove the patch, sorry for the noise. regards, Ranier Vilela
