Hi, On 2022-02-14 18:32:21 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > I do however not think it's a good idea to commit something generating > > something like the existing node functions vs going for a metadata based > > approach at dealing with node functions. That aspect of my patchset is > > independent of the libclang vs script debate. > > I think that finishing out and committing this patch is a fine step > on the way to that.
I think most of gen_node_support.pl would change - a lot of that is generating the node functions, which would not be needed anymore. And most of the remainder would change as well. > Either that, or you should go ahead and merge your backend work onto what > Peter's done ... I did offer to do part of that a while ago: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210715012454.bvwg63farhmfwb47%40alap3.anarazel.de On 2021-07-14 18:24:54 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > If Peter could generate something roughly like the metadata I emitted, I'd > rebase my node functions ontop of that. Greetings, Andres Freund
