At Thu, 17 Feb 2022 04:32:26 +0000, "kuroda.hay...@fujitsu.com" <kuroda.hay...@fujitsu.com> wrote in > > I understood here as removing following mechanism from core: > > > > * disable timeout at end of tx. > > While reading again and this part might be wrong. > Sorry for inconvenience. > But anyway some codes should be (re)moved from core, right?
I think we just don't need to add the special timeout kind to the core. postgres_fdw can use USER_TIMEOUT and it would be suffiction to keep running health checking regardless of transaction state then fire query cancel if disconnection happens. As I said in the previous main, possible extra query cancel woud be safe. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
