On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 08:44:08PM +0000, Jacob Champion wrote: > > Yeah... I was following a similar track with the initial work last > year, but I dropped it when the cost of implementation started to grow > considerably. At the time, though, it looked like some overhauls to the > stats framework were being pursued? I should read up on that thread.
Do you mean the shared memory stats patchset? IIUC this is unrelated, as the beentry stuff Michael was talking about is a different infrastructure (backend_status.[ch]), and I don't think there are any plans to move that to dynamic shared memory.
