On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 02:27:15PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > I'm fine with it. Assuming that you meant to move also the underlying > functions that goes with it (fill_hba_line and such), that would end up > removing about 15% of hba.c (after applying 0001, 0002 and 0003).
Cool. Thanks for the number. > Note that in order to do so we would need to expose quite a lot more about hba > internals, like tokenize_file() and parse_hba_line(), along with structs > HbaToken and TokenizedLine. I'd be rather fine with exposing all that in the shape of a clean split, renaming some of those structures and/or function with an Hba-like prefix, for consistency. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
