В письме от понедельник, 7 марта 2022 г. 20:04:49 MSK пользователь Greg Stark написал: > I don't think this is worth spending time adding tests for. I get what > you're saying that this is at least semi-intentional behaviour and > desirable behaviour so it should have tests ensuring that it continues > to work. But it's not documented behaviour and the test is basically > testing that the implementation is this specific implementation. > > I don't think the test is really a bad idea but neither is it really > very useful and I think it's not worth having people spend time > reviewing and discussing. I'm leaning to saying this patch is > rejected.
This is a regression test. To test if behaviour brocken or not. Actually I came to the idea of the test when I wrote my big reloption patch. I've broken this behaviour by mistake and did not notice it as it have not been properly tested. So I decided it would be goo to add test to it before adding and big patches. -- Nikolay Shaplov aka Nataraj Fuzzing Engineer at Postgres Professional Matrix IM: @dhyan:nataraj.su
