On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

>  Given that the executor
> manifestly works and has been re-engineered according to PeterG's
> requests and that many performance concerns have already been
> addressed prior to commit, Pavan and I were happy with it. My proposal
> to commit the patch was given 5 days ahead of time and no comments
> were received by anyone, not even PeterG. There was no rush and I
> personally performed extensive reviews before final commit.

 I think it's quite unfair to say that Simon rushed into this. He said this
on 29th March:

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> On 28 March 2018 at 12:00, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deola...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > v27 attached, though review changes are in
> > the add-on 0005 patch.
> This all looks good now, thanks for making all of those changes.
> I propose [v27 patch1+patch3+patch5] as the initial commit candidate
> for MERGE, with other patches following later before end CF.
> I propose to commit this tomorrow, 30 March, about 26 hours from now.
> That will allow some time for buildfarm fixing/reversion before the
> Easter weekend, then other patches to follow starting 2 April. That
> then gives reasonable time to follow up on other issues that we will
> no doubt discover fairly soon after commit, such as additional runs by
> SQLsmith and more eyeballs.

And he finally committed the patch on 2nd April late in the night. In
between, there were zero objections and no comments at all. I don't know
why this is considered as rushed.


 Pavan Deolasee                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Reply via email to