2022년 3월 9일 (수) 오전 1:19, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>님이 작성:
> Dong Wook Lee <sh95...@gmail.com> writes: > > [ 0001_add_test_pg_fsm.patch ] > > I think having some coverage here would be great, but I'm concerned that > this patch doesn't look very portable. Aren't the numbers liable to > change on 32-bit machines, in particular? > > regards, tom lane > I agree with you, but I have no good idea how to deal with it. Can the Perl TAP test be a good way? Thought?
