Le 09/03/2022 à 22:10, Justin Pryzby a écrit : > On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 08:38:04AM +0100, Gilles Darold wrote: >>> Maybe it's clearer to write this with =ANY() / != ALL() ? >>> See 002. >> I have applied your changes and produced a new version v3 of the patch, >> thanks for the improvements. The patch have been added to commitfest >> interface, see here https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/3587/ > I wondered whether my patches were improvements, and it occurred to me that > your patch didn't fail if the specified schema didn't exist. That's arguably > preferable, but that's the pre-existing behavior for tables. So I think the > behavior of my patch is more consistent.
+1 -- Gilles Darold
